Morrison, whose statement runs behind closed doors, has so far confirmed this The testimony of Bill Taylor, the leading US diplomat in Ukraine, about the two's interactions with the president to urge for investigative efforts while US aid for Ukraine was put on hold. While deviating from Taylor in some details, Morrison said that Sondland told him that the president would release the aid if the Ukrainian Attorney General announced an investigation, according to sources.
Morrison raised no concerns about the call to the National Security Council lawyers, as Vindman said. And Morrison described the rough protocol issued by the White House as a "fair account" of the tone and content of the appeal.
Morrison's concern, sources said, was that the call log would expire. He was concerned about how the leaked transcript would affect a "polarized environment" in Washington, how it would affect Ukraine's bipartisan support to Congress, and how that would affect Ukraine's perception of the US.
But Republicans backed out of the deposition and said that Morrison's statement undermines the Democrats' argument that the President has committed criminal offenses.
"The testimony of Mr. Morrison was very damaging to the Democrat 'narrative," said Rep. Mark Meadows, a Republican from North Carolina, and suggested that his testimony contradict other witnesses.
"Som The other witnesses were less than sincere, "Meadows said.
Foreign Office Chairman Eliot Engel said that Meadows' argument that Morrison's testimony was helpful to Trump and the Republicans was" ridiculous "even though he was not
One difference from Taylor's report was that Taylor testified that Morrison had told him that Trump had told Sondland he wanted www.mjfriendship.de/de/index.php?op…01&Itemid=37 However, Morrison said that it was sufficient for Trump if the Ukrainian Attorney General had announced the investigation he had requested. Englisch: www.mjfriendship.de/en/index.php?op…31&Itemid=32 Source.
At times, Morrison's lawyer has instructed his client not to answer questions about interactions with the president.
Another detail that Morrison called different was the location of an interaction.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida-based Democrat, told CNN that Morrison's lawyer had argued with House Intelligence Committee lawyers about which questions he could answer. She said they would probably come back to these questions later.
"I think the witness today had some difficulty answering certain questions," Wasserman Schultz said.
Prior to the testimony, Morrison CNN attorney Barbara Van Gelder said that privilege issues are fact specific and treated according to house rules when they occur during filing.
This story was updated on Thursday with additional developments.
CNN's Kylie Atwood and Mychael Schnell have contributed to this report.