Home / World / Trump deepened in the war with his own Intel chiefs as division

Trump deepened in the war with his own Intel chiefs as division

An insidious group of dissidents is actively working to undermine President Trump's foreign policy.

They have fundamentally different views on one main theme after another, and they have considerable power.

However, this is not the case shady activists in the deep state. They are Trump's own agents for leading national intelligence agencies, the CIA, and the FBI.

But by witnessing on the hill and offering their honest judgment, they are now in a word war with the Commander-in-Chief. Trump has joined Twitter to defeat Dan Coats, Gina Haspel, and Christopher Wray.

And this high-level censorship is taking place as some Republicans in Congress seem to demand the President more openly, at least in terms of foreign affairs. 1

9659003] The New York Times framed the conflict yesterday and many media followed its lead:

"You think that leaving Syria and Afghanistan would be a debacle, you believe that North Korea can not be trusted Islamic state It is still a threat to America, they think that Russia is bad and NATO is good.

"The trouble is that their president does not agree."

And here he expresses, like him expressing his disagreement:

seem extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran They are wrong! They test Rockets (last week) and more and come very close to the edge. [sic] Now breaks be careful with Iran. "


The Kicker:" viell The secret service should not go back to school! "

Trump simply has a rosier view than the one he set up to run these agencies, and the fissures are getting deeper.

For example, Coats in North Korea said that Pyongyang" is unlikely to complete its nuclear weapons and production capacity gives up on what Kim Jong-Un and his company consider to be "critical to the survival of the regime."

But Trump says the relationship between the US and North Korea is "the best thing ever" and there is a "decent chance for denuclearization." This is less enthusiastic when he sounded with Kim after his summit meeting, and the North has taken no concrete steps with the second summit planned for this month.

Of course, the President has a great deal of foreign policy space However, his intellectual people are not on board, and maybe I will not stay until the election. "Jim Mattis resisted The Syrian withdrawal, and he's gone-and Trump had not yet appointed a new Minister of Defense.

Some Hill Republicans are also taking on Trump's foreign policy, most notably Mitch McConnell, his closest ally. 19659003] OBAMA OVER SYRIA LIES 'RED LINE, & # 39; SET MIDDLE EAST BACK 20 YEARS, WHETHER SAUDI OFFICIAL SAY

The Majority Leader said in a speech: "While it is tempted to retreat into the comfort and safety of our shores," There is more to do, and if "these conflicts are not addressed in our own cities, they will resonate."

McConnell also urges a warning "of the dangers of an abrupt withdrawal" from Syria and Afghanistan Congressional explanations that do not affect anything, but the symbolism is clear.

There is a reason, in my opinion, for these mini-rebellions to become more public.


The Republicans lost 40 seats in November, Trump just presided over a 35-day government shutdown and took over most of the political blame, as polls show in the high 30s, and polls show that majorities are against the wall and do not think the government should be closed on this issue.

In short, Trump could be less scary for his own party. At least for now. Many Republican voters can agree with him to end American involvement in endless wars and increase border security. However, some of his own allies are beginning to hedge their bets.

Source link