قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Trump made 2 big moves this past week to reshape the Affordable Care Act: Shots

Trump made 2 big moves this past week to reshape the Affordable Care Act: Shots



Shelton Allwood joined other protesters in Miami last year to express concern about how Republicans' modification of the Affordable Care Act could affect people already suffering from the disease. The Democrats have made their defense of health law a key element of their medium-term election campaigns.

Joe Raedle / Getty Images


Hide Caption

toggle caption

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Shelton Allwood joined other protesters in Miami last year to voice concerns about how republican changes to the Affordable Care Act could affect people already suffering from the disease. Democrats have made their defense of the health law a key element of their medium-term election campaigns.

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Last week, the Trump government took two seemingly contradictory steps in less than 12 hours, which could have profound implications for the insurance marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act.

Health analysts say that at least one, along with earlier changes initiated by the administration, could help change the insurance market more than it did before the 2010 Federal Health Act entered into force – a period of regulation, reporting and consumer protection

The first move this week came on Monday morning when Trump's health officials issued guidelines that could prevent the exchange being set up for people who are completing their own health insurance. Administration guidance makes it easier for states to circumvent some ACA requirements. Among other things, Trump's guidance would allow federal subsidies for skimping plans to be used by people who already have pre-existing medical conditions.

Trump's second move – a The proposed rule, which was unveiled on Monday night, could boost the health of ACA marketplaces by attracting millions of people who now have a job based reports have armed with tax-free money from their employers to buy individual plans.

Both efforts play into the parallel narratives – one by Republicans and the other by Democrats – which dominate the bitter political debate of the parties over the ACA.

Frustrated that a Republican-controlled congress was unable to direct the Affordable Care Act, the Trump administration has continued to work to weaken this law by changing the marketplaces and consumer protection of the law, some critics and Health p. Weakening

Trump's efforts make it easier for insurers to offer skimping policies that circumvent regulatory requirements, such as the protection of individuals with pre-existing conditions or the prohibition of annual or life-long limits for insurers.

Congress has also lifted the tax burden for Americans who have not applied for health insurance next year. Taken together, these steps could reduce participation in ACA health plans – potentially increasing the premiums for those who remain.

The government and congressional Republicans say they want to support the people left behind by the ACA – people who do not receive subsidies to buy health insurance and who are desperate for less expensive ones Options – even if this means that these people can acquire less robust coverage

Even without lifting the ACA, republican efforts shift control over health insurance policy decisions back to the states, political analysts say.

" Some states will do their utmost to keep each market strong and stable, while others will not," says Sabrina Corlette, research professor at the Center for Health Insurance Reform at Georgetown University.

So what? Expectations should consumers have? Analysts say there are three key takeovers:

Protection for pre-existing health problems is uncertain

Surveys show that keeping the ACA guarantees on cover for people with medical problems is a major concern for Americans and Democrats have defended their defense Health legislation is an important part of their medium-term electoral campaigns.

Republicans got this message; Even those who voted to lift the ACA or join a lawsuit from 20 red states to repeal the federal law now say they want to protect people with pre-existing conditions. Nevertheless, the GOP legislators have not introduced a plan that would be as protective as the current law.

In August, the government released a rule that allows extended use of short-term health plans that are less expensive than the ACA guidelines. To receive these lower prices, most of these plans do not include insurance coverage for prescription drugs, obstetrics, mental health or substance abuse.

The move is unlikely for people with chronic health problems because they are short plans can reject people with pre-existing conditions or reject the care for these medical problems.

Under the rule, insurers can apply these short-term policies (which can be sold as early as next month) for up to one year with an extension option of up to three years. This reverses an Obama era policy that limited the duration of such policies to a maximum of 90 days.

Government officials estimate that such plans could attract 600,000 new signers next year, while others estimate the numbers could be much higher. The worry is when many healthy people will exit the ACA market in 2019 – it is now estimated that there are about 17 million subscribers – and instead choose short-term plans, premiums for those who remain in the ACA market. That would increase the premiums for persons with pre-existing conditions. It would also make the ACA market less attractive to insurers and could cause them to stop offering plans on the stock market.

In which state do you live in affairs

One of the biggest changes introduced with the ACA was a standard set of rules prevalent throughout the states.

Before the law came into force, consumers who bought their own cover saw enormous differences in what was offered and what protection they had, depending on the state in which they lived.

approved insurers to reject applicants with medical conditions such as diabetes, cancer, depression, Down syndrome or asthma.

Few states require insurers to claim similar premiums across the board, but most allow large differences in the amount of the premium. A customer may be burdened by age, sex, or health. Some brief plans were not enough for prescription drugs, chemotherapy or other medical services.

By standardizing the rules and benefits, the ACA barred insurers from claimants who reject medical conditions and those applicants demand higher premiums. The ACA guarantees that women can not be charged more than men for the same health policy, and insurers can not demand more than three times what younger applicants have charged.

But under the new guidelines that will be given to the states this week With greater flexibility in offers, consumers could again see a wide range of coverage, premium schemes and even eligibility.

"It is putting pressure on state politicians," says Caroline Pearson, Senior Fellow at NORC, an independent research facility at the University of Chicago. "They're risking some [constituents] being put worse off by threatening these markets," says Pearson. "That will always be difficult."

Millions more likely to join the buy-your-own ranks

The rule published on Tuesday allows employers to fund tax-free accounts – called health reimbursements, or HRAs, which workers can use to pay their own to buy their own reports on the ACA marketplaces.

The administration estimates that by 2028, about 10 million people will do so – a significant boost for federal and state ACA exchanges, which say policymakers never hit numbers that are needed to attract enough insurers and keep prices low ,

John Barkett, senior director of policy affairs at Willis Towers Watson, a benefit adviser, says he now expects some employers to "seriously consider" a state or government Federal Health Insurance Exchange to provide health insurance to their workers. And if they do, the infusion of workers will improve the opportunities within these insurance exchanges by attracting more insurers, says Barkett.

"These people are sponsored by employers, they have permanent jobs," notes Barkett, and will probably stay with the coverage longer than those typically available in the individual market.

Currently, about 17 million people buy their own health insurance, with about 10 million of those using public or state ACA marketplaces. The others buy private plans through brokers.

Trump's proposed rule will not be completed for months, but it could yield new options by 2020.

If these workers are generally healthy, the infusion could slow premium increases across the ACA market as this would improve the risk pool for insurers.

However, if employers with mainly higher costs or older workers decide to switch to marketplaces, this could increase the premiums.

A strange twist, the administration notes in its proposed rule that the ACA has provisions that could protect the market from this kind of detrimental selection that can drive up prices. But most of the protection factors cited by the Rule have been abolished or mitigated or removed by Trump or the Republican-controlled Congress – such as the tax deduction tax for uninsured and federal insurers to cover lower deductibles for certain low-income consumers

Counselor and health politician are skeptical of how many companies will move to a HRA plan given the tight labor market. Continuing uncertainty about the fate of the ACA marketplace could lead them to refuse to send workers on their own to seek health insurance, analysts said.

The health package that a company offers its employees is now an important factor in attracting and retaining workers, says Chris Condeluci, a Washington lawyer. Previously, he worked for Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and served as a consultant to the Senate Finance Committee in preparing the ACA.

"Most employers believe that their group health plan provides better health care than an individualized market plan," Condeluci says.

Kaiser Health News, a non-profit news service, is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation and not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.


Source link