قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Trump pushes the envelope into promising tax refunds

Trump pushes the envelope into promising tax refunds



T The Trump Government's decision to issue tax refunds despite the IRS funding being canceled could lead to a legal gray area.

As with other aspects of government cessation, the decision is inherently political: apart from the pragmatic desire to honor the government's obligations to taxpayers, the Trump administration is also motivated by the desire to avoid reimbursements from them, the closure and weaken the president's position in the battle for the border wall with Mexico.

Refunds may require the administration to recall thousands of IRS employees back to work without payment. However, the law requires that unsecured functions that are considered insignificant must be closed after the funding has expired, as is now the case for a majority of the federal government, as long as it does not endanger property or people's lives.

Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Chairman of the house's majority leader, called on the US government's decision in the Capitol last year, saying they only wanted to limit the political pain of closing the congressional republicans and their constituents.

"What worries me is the government, which says it can set its own rules and have their cake and eat as well," said Hoyer. "It wants to close the government and not hurt any of its priorities. It is neither a sensible attitude nor, in my opinion, a legal position.

The administration's decision to pay reimbursements is also a humiliation for Democrats. They would risk a political setback if they legally challenge the continuation of tax refunds.

For legal reasons, Monday Monday, government officials cited an Emergency Plan for the Ministry of Finance in 201

1 to continue processing tax returns, including reimbursements, on the grounds that this could damage state property: revenue from tax collection. The government not only has to collect taxes, but also pay interest on payments, including reimbursements that are delayed by decommissioning, resulting in less money than without interruption.

However, these 2011 guidelines indicated that only electronic applications could be refunded, as the IRS automatic filing system would have to make more effort than shutting down rather than running normally.

Although the Trump government cites this 2011 guidance, the Obama Administration's Office of Management and Budget has opted not to impose taxes and refund reimbursements during a standstill. Trump's OMB has reversed this decision. Mark Mazur, Executive Director of the Tax Policy Center and former Deputy Secretary of Tax Policy at Treasury for much of the Obama administration, was not sure if the Trump government's decision was legal – nor would it be challenging.

"It's a gray area," Mazur said. "I think you only see two different OMBs coming to two different decisions."

Mazur added that it was difficult to see who would be harmed by the reimbursement of reimbursements, even though Congress could legally claim that its power had been illegally abused by the IRS unilaterally Paying for reimbursements or employees could sue and claim that they were unlawfully forced to work without pay.

But so far, the unions of the IRS employees and the Democrats of the Congress are holding fires and waiting for the government to go into detail.

Asked whether the Democrats would sue the administration, as it does with regard to some of Trump's orders related to Obamacare, Hoyer said, "We can, but see what happens."


Source link