National Political Reporter on the White House, Congress and Campaigns
Investigation Reporter focused on the interface of money and politics in Washington
23. April at 20:28. 19659004] President Trump said he opposed the White House's current and former White House advisers, who testified on the podium of the congress following the special report, reinforcing a power struggle between his government and the House Democrats.
In an interview with The Washington Post, Trump, said that compliance with Congressional demands was not necessary after the White House with Special Envoy Robert S. Muller III. In terms of Russian interference and the behavior of the President in office had worked together.
"There is no reason to go further. and especially in Congress, where it is very partisan – obviously very biased, "said Trump.
Trump's comments came from the White House It is clear that the demand for information from Capitol Hill is to be largely denied, causing the two On Tuesday, two White House officials said the government plans to tackle a charge issued by the Judicial Bureau to former White House Advisor Donald McGahn by claiming executive privilege over his statement.
Regardless, the government ordered a former White House official not to obey a House Oversight Committee summons and ordered the jury to arrest him, defying Congress, and the Ministry of Finance opposed a second demand from House Democrats, the tax declaration of President Trum p over six years.
Taken together, these steps represent a dramatic escalation of tensions between the President and the Democrats of Congress, which may deepen the struggle. Solved only through a lengthy legal dispute.
House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Said Tuesday that the findings of the Mueller report, Congressional investigation and the White House response had created a defining moment in our history.
"Now we see how the government is looking at the facts that have come to the American people," Pelosi said in an interview for the Time 100 summit in New York.
White House lawyers want to tell lawyers for witnesses to the administration Parliament has called on the executive branch of the executive to assert the executive power of the executive for their testimony, according to two officials who are familiar with internal plans and who are interviewed like others Condition of Anonymity.
In his interview with The Post, Trump argued that the White House lawyer's office had not made a "final, final decision" on whether he would formally impose executive privileges and trials on Congressional testimony. However, he said he refuses to cooperate with the House Democrats, who he claimed were political points against
"I do not want people to testify to a party because they do that when they do that. Trump said.
The President said the Democrats should be satisfied with what McGahn and other officials have said to Mueller, and called for his decision to make an act of federalism with federal investigators that made unreasonable further Congressional cooperation.
"I have allowed my lawyers and all the people to go to Miller – and you know how I think about this whole group of people who wrote the Miller Report," Trump said. "I was so transparent. They said so many hours. They have all this information that has been given. "
" I fully understood that at the beginning. I had the choice, "Trump added, to admit that his aides could testify to Müller's investigation. "I could have taken the absolutely opposite route."
Legal experts said that a White House effort to enforce executive law on possible testimony from McGahn and other past and present assistants who have spoken to the Special Adviser will face legal challenges.  "It seems to me that executive law has been lifted when McGahn gave testimony and was interviewed by Special Prosecutor Mueller," former Watergate prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste said. "I do not see how the White House can enforce executive privileges with something that has already been revealed. To use the Watergate phrase, "You can not put the toothpaste back in the tube."
Jerrold Nadler (DN.Y.), chairman of the House's Judiciary Committee, said Tuesday that the panel specifically looks for McGahn's statements on the topics described in Mueller's report, which is now publicized in an edited form.
"As such, the moment for the White House to claim a privilege to prevent this statement from being heard has long since passed," Nadler said in a statement. McGahn was mentioned more than 150 times in Mueller's report and told the investigators how the President had pressured him to oust the special advocate, and then urged him to deny the episode in public.
McGahn's public testimonies could create a parallel spectacle of the testimony of President Richard Nixon, former White House lawyer in June 1973, John Dean, whose live television appearance in front of a Senate committee drew a vivid portrait of the country's White Ho cover-up Watergate burglary.
McGahn's lawyer William Burck began discussions with the Judiciary Committee about his potential testimony after the panel issued a summons on Monday.
People near McGahn who were not allowed to speak publicly said McGahn that he was "following the trial" and working with the White House on his next steps, despite Trump's public and private rage over the prominence of his former lawyer in the report Mueller.
"He's not zealously testifying He does not hesitate, he's got a subpoena, it's forcing him to testify, but there are some legal counter-arguments that could prevent that," said a person near McGahn who spoke of the Anonymity spoke to describe private discussions. "He does not want to despise Congress, nor disregard his ethical obligations and legal obligations as a former White House official."
Meanwhile, on Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee has dismissed the former Executive Council Carl Kline, White House Security Director, disregards the Congress for failing to appear at a hearing on alleged misconduct in the White House's security investigation.
The panel came to Kline, according to a white house whistleblower, Tricia Newbold, who claimed this The White House granted the security a relatives – including the son-in-law of President Jared Kushner – ruthlessly reviewing the coworkers' objections.
Newbold, who conducted the Kline White House security checks for the first two years of administration, told the jury that more than two dozen recommended security checks were lifted during the Trump administration. She said the congress was her "last hope" because he addressed what she saw as inappropriate behavior that exposed the secrets of the nation.
The White House Deputy, Michael M. Purpura, wrote Monday a letter in which he taught Kline, who now works at the Defense Department, so as not to appear before the committee for a proposed deposition.
In a letter to Kline's lawyer requested by The Post, Purpura wrote that a committee had been summoned to ask Kline to "unconstitutionally intrude on fundamental executive interests." 19659033] The White House advisers said the government would try to prevent Kline from giving testimony and prevent other government officials from talking to the panel about safety clearance.
In a separate letter, Kline attorney Robert Driscoll told the panel Monday that his client would abide by the White House's recommendation.
"With two masters from two equal government branches, we will follow the instructions of the one who hires him," wrote Driscoll.
In his reply, MEP Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), Chairman of the Supervisory Committee, said: that he would consult with household effects and members of the House of Lords panel on planning a vote to hold Kline in disregard of Congress.
"The White House and Mr. Kline are now open to a duly-authorized Congress summons, without President Trump Cummings said in a statement, "Because of these actions, the President seems to think that the Constitution does not apply to his White House, that he can deliberately order officials to violate their legal obligations, and that he might interfere with Congress's attempt to supervise. "19659038] On Tuesday, Driscoll said that e He and his client "take seriously" the concerns of the committee as well as the instructions of the White House.
"We will continue to review the process and make the best decisions we can," he said
The Legal Advisers of the House Democratic have in the past been dealing with the process of summoning Congress to a strategy for enforcement contempt without the support of the Ministry of Justice.
In this case, the house would be forced to use civil litigation.
A similar dynamic took place during the Obama administration, when then Attorney General Eric H. Holder jr. faced with a summons and contempt from the House Oversight Commi The company sought information about a controversial arms trafficking enforcement program called Operation Fast and Furious.
Efforts to secure Holder's information began in 2011 but were not fully resolved until 2016, long after he left office.
A person near Pelosi said she fully supports the efforts of its committee chairs to ensure that House investigators ensure the information that legislators believe they must hold the White House accountable.
Efforts to block Congress have also extended to Trump's finances. On Monday, the Trump organization filed a lawsuit to prevent an accounting firm from meeting Trump's financial records for eight years with a subpoena from the committee.
And Finance Minister Steven Mnuchin said on Tuesday to an important lawmaker that he would make a final decision on whether to file Trump's tax returns by 6 May and, for the first time, put a definite deadline in a power struggle.
In a 10-page letter to the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.), Mnuchin said the Democrats' demand for Trump's tax return raises issues of constitution and data protection which must be resolved by the Ministry of Justice before it can decide how to proceed.
The administration continues to work on a legal reason not to accept Trump's taxes, White House officials said.
Rachael Bade, Damian Paletta and Erica Werner contributed to this report.