قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Trump's lies are bolder and the press is stuck in the middle

Trump's lies are bolder and the press is stuck in the middle



I am often told that the people of Trump's noise and nonsense are "deaf". But let's examine this for a minute:

Why is there no more indignation?

Some people, mostly Trump fans, excuse or rationalize the lies for various reasons. Others just can not. So much of the anti-Trump outrage from Progressives and Anti-Trump Conservatives and columnists and experts amounts to "He's deceiving you, he's lying to your face, is not it your interest?"

And the press is right Correct answer: If you commit yourself to facts, you get the name "false news". Which is another lie.

Old-fashioned news-business principles disappear in this fog of disinformation. For example, "What the President says is news." I still think that's true, but if he tells you not to trust your own eyes and ears, is that really new?

Müller's Best Moments

Robert Müller was probably the most criticized man in America on Wednesday. And I'll come back to that right away. But I thought his strongest moments were witnessing Trump's claims about Russia, WikiLeaks, special advocacy, and so on. This CNN banner summed it up perfectly: "Mueller: Trump was not relieved, Russia's election campaign was no joke, and investigation was not a witch hunt."

  Former Special Adviser Robert Mueller arrives to discuss his report on the investigation of Russian interference announcing the 201[ads1]6 presidential election during a hearing of the House Select Committee on Intelligence on Capitol Hill.

The hearings also reminded the audience of the remarkable number of Trump employees who were caught in the meeting making "false statements" to the authorities.

Muller's repeated claims of reality prompted NBC's to tweet Jonathan Allen, "One thing that gets lost because we got so used to it is the number of things the President has to the public said that Muller's investigation revealed that these were lies, from jokes to business deals in Russia, lying to the public to hurt presidents. "

Rationalism for the Lies

" The public is lying Allen, to injure President, said Allen. Well, it hurt Trump too – he's never cracked 50% in trustworthy ratings reviews, and about two-thirds of voters call him dishonest, meaning that even some of his followers know he's cheated, and that they do accept it.

What are the explanations and excuses for the Pinocchios? I've heard many:

– Some Trump supporters say he speaks to a "greater truth," though he does not understand the smaller facts correctly. For example, when telling stories about illegal voting, he points out a threat he considers real and looks for their votes.

– Other Trump supporters openly accept his personality blunders and sometimes lukewarmly criticize his worst impulses in exchange for long-awaited political achievements.

– Some supporters also say "all politicians are lying" and ignore the fact that Trump's lies are in their own league.

– You also excuse some of its deception as trolling, you know, "own the libs".

– And there are two powerful words that make it a lot easier to look away: "We win."

– Scientists usually find that the conservative media machine does not look much for facts and prefers even the least to promote incriminating statements by the President.

– Influential members of the Pro Trump media reject factual reviews as liberal propaganda and continue to isolate the base.

– Hardcore members of "the resistance" like to say that Trump fans are members of a cult.

"Motivated thinking"

I asked the political scientist and Dartmouth professor Brendan Nyhan about it. "We often have trouble telling why people believe things," he told me frankly. "There is a lot of research into & # 39; motivated thinking & # 39 ;, including my work, which finds that people check information that confirms their priorities less accurately, and that they more precisely contradict information that contradicts them Other theories suggest that people affirm things that they know to be at least wrong Some degree of expression of their political feelings / affiliations or this is a way to signal your loyalty to a leader. "

  Fact check Trump Falsely Told Muller Correcting the Proposition that He May Be Accused Once He Is Out of Office

An extremely important investigation of a Russian attack on the US election is therefore a "joke" because the chairman says so.

Does the brain adapt?

I also called Tali Sharot, the director of the Affective Brain Lab and the author of The Influential Mind. Together with several colleagues, she examined how people adapt to lies over time. "If they are lying, they have a negative emotional arousal in their heads," she said, much like self-punishment. But emotion "adapts very quickly." The more people lie, the less they feel this emotional reaction.

Sharot wonders: Do the people around her also adjust if a human lies more monstrously? "It's becoming the norm," she guesses. When I mentioned Trump, she said, "I think a lot of people get used to the lie and they do not look as negative as they did a few years ago."

Trumpworld even lies about the lies!

This exchange took place outside the W.H. on Tuesday:

Reporter: "The president said he was asked by Indian Prime Minister Modi to mediate between India and Pakistan, and India says that this is not even close to the truth, the president just thought it up, sir ? "

Larry Kudlow: "No, the president did not come up with anything, I think that's a very rude question, I'll stay out of it, it's out of my lane."

Lying should be front and center

Reject lies or accept lies. That's the gap. However, there is a third option: Report. Document the whole deception. That's what journalists like Daniel Dale do, now at CNN. He wrote on Wednesday evening about one of Trump's lies.

But Dale is still the exception. Most media still do not put the lies front into focus most of the time. Many news agencies are still wary of the word. And I understand – not everything is a lie – but many of the President's tweets and quotes can be described as misleading, manipulative, or illogical, even if they are not completely fact-free. An increasing number of White House correspondents, broadcasters and columnists are convinced. However, some newsrooms are still reluctant to speak that truth. (Look at the recent debate on whether he should call his racist tweets racist.) The result: The bar is far lower for Trump than for other political leaders.

The end of the impeachment debate?

Oliver Darcy emails: When the history books are written, Wednesday will probably be remembered as the day when the possibility of an impeachment investigation by the Russian probe was put to bed. The Republicans did not believe Müller, and there was little chance he could speak to change their mind. Mueller's testimony forced the Democrats to act and convince the minds of Americans who live in the political center. It was not like that.

Mueller's report may be damned, but his performance was anything but. His lackluster testimony, often puzzled and confused, actually helped the Republicans and Trump allies delegitimize Müller's results. Müller's enigmatic clips are already flying around in the right-wing media universe and are played up by Trump. While it is unlikely that the testimony will move the needle for Congressional Democrats or people in the center of the country, it will certainly help harden Trump's base …

The "optics" debate

Social Media Everywhere On Wednesday there were complaints about experts commenting on the "look" of the hearings. It has now become a meme.

Chuck Todd was particularly criticized for tweeting that Müller's answers are current in content, "but in terms of optics, this was a disaster." Maria Bustillos of CJR replied: "Politics is not entertainment, it is not a service that needs to be criticized." Reporting on national politics is a public trust of grave importance that affects hundreds of millions of people. " But here's the counter-argument to Politico's Jake Sherman : "In planning this hearing, the Democrats told us that it's about optics, bringing the report to life, they said, saying we'd be very little Learn New, but Have "Importance" Without Being "Exciting" "

Brian Lowry emails: During the first session, MSNBC's legal analyst, Chuck Rosenberg, revealed what seemed like a reprimand to some of his colleagues: "There is a difference between exciting and important, there are things that are exciting, that are not important, and there are things that are not particularly exciting." Rosenberg's statement to Chuck Todd, but which could easily apply to any number of people who characterized the testimony as "catastrophic," almost from the beginning, or from those who got carried away too much, is the book ; This is the analogy to the movie.

Obviously, the audience, which has been heavily involved in the Trump presidency, has reacted poorly to the assumptions required by today's hearings to bring glamor and showmanship into the narrative. In a way, it all comes down to the idea that the impact of the day will come less from the hours that are seen live than from the way the points and allegations affirmed by the testimonial are recycled and spun – a process that admittedly will see people receive this information through their usual message bubbles …

For the first part

– "With a looming six-week August break and the views of the Most Americans Limited to What's Now With a two-year history, a lasting change in public opinion is unlikely, "Nicholas Fandos of the NYT wrote …
– Susan Glasser's review of The New Yorker: "Concern for Muller's performance is not just theater criticism, he was unable to convey his report and results defend except that he repeatedly referred to the text. He had to clearly explain the conclusions he came to and the reason. He has not … "
-" After seeing Mueller's oft-faltering, monosyllabic testimony com when the Democrats' hopes for a televised moment that could lead to prosecution were not yet fulfilled Jeremy Diamond of CNN …
– Rachel Maddow's message on Wednesday night : "I hope that members of Congress, especially the Leadership of the Congress, acknowledge that OPEN HEARINGS, open hearings in front of the cameras, are really important for the country to handle even the most controversial cases. "She added," I hope these are the first of many …

Comparing and Contrasting

Trump looked like a fighter when he was seen pacing up and down Qs from the press, repeatedly saying, "You are fake news en "and called a questioner" one of the worst ".

An hour later, Nancy Pelosi spoke like a friend while speaking at a press conference. "President Lincoln said the public feeling is everything, so that the public can feel it, the public needs to know," she said. "I hope you communicate the truth to the public and we believe that today was a milestone to better inform this mood."

For comparison and contrast I have sent a tweet Trump's "no obstruktion" poster from the May and Pelosis "no exoneration" poster from Wednesday …

As it reports on Fox

"There was a potential that the testimony to Fox News was of particular importance to channel viewers," wrote David Bauder of the AP, "since the network's hosts repeatedly mocked Muller during the investigation and Trump frequented Opportunities had admitted to wrongly declare that the report had acquitted him of giving audiences a chance to hear what they did not have before. "

But" the reaction of Fox & # 39; on-air staff on Wednesday: It Fox & # 39; s Chris Wallace said during the first break in the judicial committee hearing: "This was a disaster for the Democrats and a disaster for Robert Müller's reputation." The Comment has been transcribed by Trump and tweeted quickly … "

What Hannity said

Rudy Giuliani began and finished his day with Fox – before he prepared the hearing at" Fox & Friends "and then recorded a victory round in Sean Hannity's show.

The Daily Beasts Maxwell Tani and Andrew Kirell found that several House Republicans molested Mueller with "Hannity's questions" with Devin Nunes …

>> And Fox just announced that Trump will be in Hannity's on Thursday night Call show. Fox counts it as an "exclusive interview …"

For the record, part two

– WaPo's version of the book "Mueller Report" was released on Wednesday during and in Amazon's Top 10 the hearings … (Amazon)
– Michael Grynbaum: "On Wednesday came on the small screen, the great revelation: Mr. Müller was finally just a man." (NYT)
– Max Stiefel's column for WaPo: "Müller wins the facts – but loses on TV." (WaPo)
– Slate published a list of important news events overshadowed by the hearing in Mueller, including Boris Johnson, who is officially becoming Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and a suicide bombing in Somalia … (Slate)


Source link