قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Trump's stance on the presidency is never given up

Trump's stance on the presidency is never given up







The president refuses to apologize for his Muslim banktalk ̵

1; although it may help to save his travel ban.

He travels to more than a dozen countries, tweeted hundreds of times and spoke tens of thousands of words. But very rarely has he expressed his regret.

History below

Even less often has he apologized.

"He does not apologize," a former Trump administration official said bluntly. "In general, he does not think he's retreating."

Trump did not back off when he apologized for deadly violence in Charlottesville, Virginia. He refused to distance himself from his repeated inaccuracies about widespread voter fraud. And more recently, he blamed a corrosive and disgusting culture in Washington – not the lack of scrutiny of his own government – for derailing the nomination of White House Physician Ronny Jackson to head the Department of Veterans Affairs.

On Monday, Trump again denied any repent that says, "There is nothing to apologize for" asking him if he would refuse his earlier brand comments on a Muslim ban to save his broader travel ban policy ,

The problem re-emerged after Chief Justice John Roberts asked during a Supreme Court hearing last week whether a public denial of his campaign rhetoric by Trump calling for a ban on all Muslims in the US raised concerns about the travel ban on constitutionality. The lawyer who challenged the ban said it would.

But Trump, when he got the opportunity on Monday to offer a version of a public denial, instead offered a stiff upper lip.

"There is no need to apologize, our immigration laws in this country are a total disaster, they are laughed at all over the world, they are laughed at for their stupidity, and we have strong immigration laws," Trump said he was interviewed at a press conference on the statements of the Supreme Court. "I think if I apologize, I would not make a difference of ten cents for them. There is nothing to apologize for."

Trump's comments could still reflect the government's efforts to defend its policy in court make it difficult and doubt two of its big election promises.

The travel ban was one of the first political steps announced by the president and has proved to be one of the hardest to implement. Initial versions of the ban were immediately challenged in court, rejected by the courts and then replaced by the administration, resuming the cycle when the policy passed into the Supreme Court hearing last week.

The latest version of the policy, last published in September, targets eight nations, six of which have Muslim populations.

While Trump has refused to run away from his harsh campaign over banning Muslims, his allies have tried to do the work for him. Last May The same day that an appeal ban was heard by a federal appeals court in Virginia, a written statement demanding "a complete and complete closure of Muslims entering the United States" disappeared from the site the Trump campaign to disappear.

The Supreme Court argued last week about the latest version of the travel ban policy, a major issue was whether Trump's campaign remarks should be used to assess his current policies. A lawyer defending the ban insisted that Trump had rejected his call for a "Muslim ban".

"The President made it clear on September 25 that he had no intention of enforcing the Muslim ban," said Solicitor General Noel Francisco. This seems to refer to the structure of the travel ban scheme that Trump signed last September.

"He made crystal clear that the Muslims in this country are big Americans and there are many, many Muslim countries that love this country and he has praised Islam as one of the great countries [sic] of the world", Francisco added.

The Trump administrator's comment raised questions to the White House as to whether the president had actually ruled that he was wrong when he called for a ban on Muslims entering the US during the presidential campaign

Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the answer to this question is clear, but she has never formulated it correctly.

"The focus of this travel ban was on safety and security, limited to a small number of countries and a lot of Muslims – most countries have the same ability to travel to and from the United States as in previous governments," said she during a press conference last week. "I think that alone, in action, your question answered clearly."

The White House has characterized the travel ban as a national security necessity, with officials stating that the policy was built on a global review and makes Trump's own remarks

The former government official stressed that the other cases in which the President refused to apologize, went so far as to express the last urge for clarity on his Muslim ban, a "political game" to make him look bad, that would ultimately have no effect on the judiciary.

"They try to make Trump say something that everyone in the world knows he will not do," the official said. "And the fact of the matter is that it will not matter."

Nevertheless, Trump's legal opponents rushed to his statement on Monday.

"The President's refusal to apologize for his past hateful comments proves even more. It's really a Muslim ban," said Mana Kharrazi, Executive Director of Iranian Alliances across the Borders, who successfully challenged the Fourth Circuit ban had, towards POLITICO.

"His actions should be as meaningful to the courts as to his electoral base and to racists who use violence against our communities," Kharrazi added.


Source link