KABUL, Afghanistan – US and Taliban officials have agreed in principle to the framework of a peace agreement in which the insurgents guarantee that Afghan territory will not be used by terrorists and this could lead to the complete withdrawal of American troops The truce and Taliban talks with the Afghan government were said by the United States' chief negotiator on Monday.
"We have a draft of the framework that needs to be worked out before it becomes an agreement," said US Envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, in an interview with the New York Times in Kabul. "The Taliban have undertaken to our satisfaction to do the bare necessities to prevent Afghanistan from ever becoming a platform for international terrorist groups or individuals."
After nine years of ending efforts to reach a peace agreement with the Taliban, the preliminary draft framework is the largest tangible step towards a two-decade war that has cost tens of thousands of lives and profoundly changed American foreign policy.
A high-ranking American official who wanted to remain anonymous to discuss the ongoing negotiations, said the Taliban delegation had asked for time to discuss with their leadership the American insistence that the insurgents be involved speak to the Afghan Government and agree to a ceasefire under a signed agreement. The official said that they had made it clear to the Taliban that all the issues discussed were "linked" as part of a "package deal" that he compared to a Russian nesting doll. The official's report was supported by details that had been leaked in recent days by some Taliban and Western officials.
Although other Taliban sources said that more details of a withdrawal of American troops had already been agreed, American officials said on Monday that details had not yet been eradicated.
Mr. Khalilzad returned to Afghanistan on Sunday to brief the government in Kabul after six days of talks with the Taliban delegation in Doha, Qatar.
Speaking Khalilzad to the nation, President Ashraf Ghani expressed his concern A peace agreement would be swift. He highlighted earlier settlements that ended in bloodshed, including when the Soviet Union left the country in the late 1980s.
Despite a promise of a peace agreement, Afghanistan collapsed into anarchy at that time and years later the Afghan president. During this transition, he was hanged on a staff.
"We want peace fast, we want it soon, but we want it prudently," Ghani said. "Prudence is important so that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past."
During talks last week, the Taliban signaled their earnestness by serving one of their most powerful officials from the original movement, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar Having appointed as their chief peace negotiator.
Although American and Afghan officials said Mr Baradar had not been directly involved in the marathon meetings last week, with some sessions taking up to eight hours, he should take the lead in the upcoming talks. High-ranking American officials said new high-level talks would begin in late February, but pointed out that teams from both sides could begin with technical details before.
The interview with Mr. Khalilzad on Monday was the first time that the American government spoke for the first time. Some details of the agreement were immediately confirmed.
As a first step in the framework, Khalilzad said the Taliban strongly agreed to prevent the Afghan territory from groups such as Al Qaeda and other international terrorists and had agreed to provide guarantees and an enforcement mechanism for this promise.
This has long been a primary requirement of American officials to prevent Afghanistan from becoming a terrorist base again. It was at the beginning of the war, in 2001, after Al Qaeda attacked the US on September 11.
The Next Series of Eventualities Determined by US Offices Involved in the negotiations, the United States would agree to withdraw the combat troops from Afghanistan, but only for the Taliban to have talks with the Afghan government and one permanent ceasefire.
The last two points are long ago Taliban officials resisted and still refused the trial. The Taliban delegation in Qatar said they would have to break down to discuss these details with their leadership.
However, the basic agreement to even discuss it was seen as a breakthrough after years of failed attempts, American and Afghan officials said.  While these initial issues were generally accepted by high-ranking Afghan officials, there is concern that the Afghan government has still been excluded from the talks. Officials close to Mr. Ghani are particularly concerned that the Americans could negotiate important agreements that Afghan officials have not joined, possibly in the form of a transitional government outside of elections.
Mr. Ghani has repeatedly insisted that these details should only be taken up in direct talks between the government and the Taliban. [KhalilzadinsistedonMondaythathewastryingtourgetheTalibantonegotiatetheseissuesdirectlywiththeAfghanside19659002] "There are many reports that we have discussed about an interim government: No, I have not got into any of these discussions," Khalilzad said. "I did not go into what the Taliban might look like – they want to talk to me about it, but I do not have it."