قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Science / "What we need to live and work in space"

"What we need to live and work in space"

To further the vision, Meyerson is also helping to organize an initiative of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, which will be launched next year to bring together non-aerospace companies needed to develop a more mature space industry.

Meyerson also spoke with POLITICO about some, in his opinion, major obstacles to investing in public and private sector development, as well as his fears that new and innovative competitors could surpass the US if it does not get serious.

"I really think we need to focus on that and start producing again," he says. "We've gotten used to keeping promises, and if we go on as we did in the recent past, we risk losing a significant edge in space technology, and I think that could be." very dangerous. "

This transcript has been edited for reasons of length and clarity.

Tell us about your new company Delalune Space.

I was the last one For 1

5 years as president of Blue Origin, and headed the company from the beginning as an engineering office, Blue was a think tank before I got there, there were about 10 people there when I joined in. I worked for Jeff Bezos and the company was 10 Previously, I was at NASA's Johnson Space Center and at Kistler Aerospace, Actually, I've been in the commercial space industry for 23 years.

I founded Delalune Space to reflect my long-term vision of space evolution and development realize the use of resources on the moon, use space resources to cut costs, and ultimately open up adjacent markets and non-space markets, and to try Some attract the companies in the space industry that we will need to grow the space industry over time.

Which types of "adjacent markets" are we talking about?

What we need to live and work in outer space – mining companies, construction companies, companies that use resources such as manufacturing, drug development, and healthcare. But also hospitality, food and drink and agriculture. After all, there are lunar surface roads, landing sites, and the energy infrastructure we need to support resource use.

I think if you look in the middle of the next decade, you will have commercial space stations, commercial transports from Earth to Earth orbit and from Earth orbit to the Moon's orbit and commercial transports to the surface of the earth a combination of public and private partners. And I think the infrastructure will be the foundation for a market where other companies build on it. I find that very exciting.

Are you a partner of AIAA at their ASCEND forum?

It stands for Accelerating Space Commerce, Exploration and New Discovery. It will be an annual event and it starts in November 2020. It will be held in Las Vegas. This is different from your classic conferences. It will not be just a group of space professionals talking to each other. We bring in these adjacent markets. We want to involve the investment community, we want to involve the business community, and we want to include those markets, as I mentioned earlier – hospitality, mining, agriculture, infrastructure, construction, telecommunications.

The other difference between ASCEND and other conferences is that they are result-oriented conferences. We will set up working groups to prepare position papers, white papers, policy designs and projects that we can carry out, or we will form a working group that will work together over a period of months or years to solve a problem. Consider what is required. to build that business or idea and the obstacles in the way.

What are some of the biggest room space obstacles you can imagine?

The funding is obvious. We have always had and always will. Individuals will not pay for it. It will cost tens to hundreds of billions of dollars to make room.

I think there are some political obstacles, such as: B. Intellectual property rights for space depletion. Space traffic management is also a task: It controls launchers with aircraft in national airspace as well as launchers and satellites from near-earth orbit to cis-lunar space.

How do you see the United States holding its own against big targets against China and other nations? Should we go to the moon or to Mars, for example? Should we do it with humans or with robots? Should we add a gateway or go directly to the moon? I think all this arguing brings no added value. We have to do everything.

I really believe that somehow we have to concentrate and start producing again. We have become accustomed to keeping promises. If we continue as we have in the recent past, we risk losing a significant edge in space technology. And I think that can be very dangerous.

Source link