Michael Sanchez declined on Wednesday to give CNN a note on the record as to whether he was the leader. Previously, he had withheld the Washington Post from playing a role in searching details of the relationship between Bezos and his sister, and told the New York Post that he would not acknowledge such allegations with an answer.
A representative of AMI told CNN on Wednesday that the company refuses to comment on sources.
Suggestions as to whether Trump or Saudi Arabia might have played a role in uncovering the relationship are unfounded since Bezos made them for the first time Last week's blog post detailing its interactions with the National Enquirer describes.
In a blog post, Bezos made confusing details appear to the reader, mentioning both Trump and Saudi Arabia.
Bezos wrote that his Washington Post estate, which had critically treated both Trump and the Saudi Arabian government, was a "complainer" to him.
In fact, Bezos suggested, although he did not say directly that the Saudis or Trump, or possibly both, had played a role in exposing his relationship with the National Enquirer.
But six days later, Bezos has done no evidence to support these ideas. Although he made e-mails available to support his blackmail allegations, but the lack of evidence for the other explosive proposals has only increased the interest in the matter.
. "American Media has neither editorial nor financial ties with Saudi Arabia," a company spokesman told CNN earlier this week in response to questions about this matter.
He came up with the idea that the Enquirer's investigation was in some way prompted by the Saudis or AMI's desire to connect to the Saudis. One acting high-ranking employee at AMI said to CNN on Wednesday: "All of us laugh that this has become one thing because it's a year old – Saudi Arab never gave the Enquirer any money. "
While de Becker said he passed this information on to Bezos' lawyers, he declined to give the public any details of what his investigation found. The Daily Beast reported that it had reviewed documents related to the investigation, but it was not clear whether the documents came from Becker's investigation.
De Becker did not provide CNN with a comment on the record despite repeated requests. A representative from Amazon also declined to comment. He found that the questions did not concern the company. Bezos has no other known speakers to represent him.
Among the questions asked by CNN de Becker and the Amazon spokesman were: Why did Bezos mention the Saudis and Trump in his blog post? What were the results of the investigation of de Becker? Will Bezos ever publish information about Becker's investigation with the public?
In his first blog post by Bezos, he shared an email from Dylan Howard, Chief Content Officer of National Enquirer. Howard described in this email the various photos he said the tabloid was receiving "during our news gathering." These photos included what Howard referred to as a selfie under the belt (otherwise colloquially referred to as a "d * ck pick") and other explicit photos by Lauren Sanchez and Bezos.
Michael Sanchez insisted on Tuesday at CNN – before CNN reported that he was the original source of the National Enquirer – he was told that the investigation had dismissed him from "any involvement" in connection with Bezo's "Genitalia" photos. liberated ". He said that the information was provided to him by a third party with knowledge of the investigation and that he had not been informed directly that he had been released by investigators.
He was involved in the leak of the D * ck images because I never had access to any D * ck images, "he told CNN.
Michael Sanchez also has doubts on Tuesday about the accuracy of the investigation de Becker said that in the course of the investigation, de Becker "never asked for my phone, laptop or notes" or "identified himself as an investigator." He suggested that Bezos' proposal that Saudis or Trump could potentially have a role as the leak of text messages to the National Enquirer plays an attempt to distract.