قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / William Barr Interview: Attorney General says Ministry of Justice and Mueller are discussing "legal analysis" in Russia report

William Barr Interview: Attorney General says Ministry of Justice and Mueller are discussing "legal analysis" in Russia report



In an exclusive interview with "CBS This Morning" Attorney General William Barr Robert Müller and the Ministry of Justice disagree on the "legal analysis" in the Special Adviser's report on Russia's interference in presidential elections in 2016 , Mueller said his investigation did not reveal that President Trump is obstructing the judiciary, but he does not relieve him. Barr said he believes that Mueller could have come to a conclusion whether the president obstructs the judiciary.

During an almost hour-long interview in Anchorage, Alaska, Jan Crawford, chief correspondent for CBS News, urged the Attorney General on a range of issues, from disability to his new review of the Russia investigation. The Attorney General said he was surprised when Muller told him that he would not decide whether the President would interfere with the judiciary, but he did not press it, and then intervened in collaboration with Justice Department lawyers and ruled the decision the evidence met Mueller had gathered.

When asked about the fundamental difference between his and Müller's view of what the evidence collected during the Russia investigation meant, Barr said, "I think Bob said he would not deal with the analysis, he would not Either way, we made a decision and we analyzed the law and the facts and a group of us spent a lot of time and found that, for legal reasons, both are not a hindrance. "

" For legal reasons? " Crawford asked.

"For legal reasons, in other words, we disagreed with the legal analysis, much of the legal analysis in the report, and it did not reflect the views of the department," said Barr. "It was the views of a particular lawyer or lawyer, so we applied what we thought was the right law."

This decision, set out in a four-page summary, opened the Attorney General's criticism that he, too, was soft on President Trump.

"I've tried to come to a conclusion," Barr said, responding to this criticism. "And the upshot was that Bob Mueller identified some episodes, he came to no conclusion, he provided both sides of the problem, and he ̵

1; his conclusion was that he did not relieve the president, but no crime either."

While Barr testified before the congress on the report of the Special Representative, Müller wants the report to speak for itself and has signaled that he does not want to testify. Barr said if he does, it's up to him.

Barr says Mueller could have "made a decision"

"But I think the line he draws, which he keeps, what he said in the report, is the right line for every departmental official" , Barr said.

Crawford also questioned the Attorney General on Müller's last caution in his remarks that "there were several systematic efforts to intervene in our election" and how the Department of Justice is ensuring that this does not happen again in 2020.

" Yes, I think we have an increasingly robust program that focuses on foreign influence in our electoral process, "Barr said. "I recently talked with the FBI Director about putting together a high-level special group to make sure that we are fully prepared for the upcoming elections."

The President has repeatedly accused former intelligence officials of dropping the ball by also fixing him a lot and "spying on" his campaign. Barr testified that he believes espionage had taken place in relation to the Trump campaign, and specifically criticized the use of the word "espionage".

"Yeah, I mean, I think it's kinda got a dirty word, it's never been for me, I think there's nothing wrong with spying, the question is always whether it's allowed by law", Barr said.

Some former intelligence chiefs said that President Trump's negative accusations that the Russian investigation had been a witch hunt and a joke put a negative spin on espionage. Critics say the use of the word "espionage" by Barr signaled his loyalty to Mr. Trump.

"You know, it's part of the craziness of the present day that if a president uses a word, it's suddenly misplaced, it's a perfectly good English word, I'll keep using it." Said Barr.

"What did you see, what evidence?" Crawford pressed.

"Like many other people who are familiar with intelligence activities, I had many questions about what's going on," said Barr. "I assumed that I would get answers when I come in, and I have not got answers that are good, satisfying, and in fact I probably do not have more questions and some of the facts I've learned. " Not related to the official explanations, what happened.

When asked what he means, Barr said, "That's all I really want to say. Things are just not jiving. "A US election is just as dangerous as outside interference, so he launched an investigation into the actions of the intelligence services in the run up to the 2016 election.

He asked the President to provide information he deems possible. be in the public interest.


Source link