Zuckerberg's approach to political speech has come under fire in recent weeks. Democrats have particularly criticized Facebook's decision to allow a rally from President Trump's 2020 campaign that contained falsehoods about former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Responded to Facebook's decision by publishing her own campaign ad, satirically declaring Zuckerberg support Trump's re-election.
Zuckerberg formulated the topic as part of a broader debate on freedom of expression and warned that the dangers of social networks, including Facebook, are "possibly too big". He called on the United States to set an example of tailor-made regulation unlike other countries, including China, which censored political speeches online. And Zuckerberg stressed that Facebook must be strong against governments that want to "freeze" freedom of speech in the face of growing social and political tensions.
Zuckerberg's appearance in Washington marks his haunting attempt to articulate his vision of how governments and technology work Giants should be approaching the toughest problems of the Internet. The scale of Facebook and the associated apps Instagram and WhatsApp, which form a virtual community of billions of users, challenges Zuckerberg and regulators around the world with hate speech, lies, violent imagery, and terrorist social propaganda have to fight media.
Zuckerberg will testify at a Congressional hearing next week that is likely to serve as a comprehensive review of the company's business practices. The size of Facebook has become a major criticism of some Democrats who aspire to the White House in 2020 and believe that Facebook is too big, powerful and problematic and should be regulated or broken up.
The election gives the Democrats new urgency Facebook issues. The social network became an important disinformation platform during the 201
6 race. Experts say that the forms of manipulation and deception have since evolved, including the arrival of deepfakes or videos that convincingly distort what an artificial intelligence subject does or says. A fake clip of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), With whom she was drunk and who became viral on Facebook in May, drew attention to the problem.
Zuckerberg acknowledged that Facebook strives to combat such digital media. He revealed that on Deepfake videos Facebook "worked on how our guidelines should look like". "I think we are on the verge of releasing at least the first version," Zuckerberg said. He declined to provide additional details.
The tech giant declined to shut down the video, but later added a comment that it was wrong and sharply criticized the house speaker and others that the company had failed to answer an obvious question.
Asked whether the Pelosi incident represented a serious gap on Facebook, Zuckerberg agreed. "If something becomes a big problem and we have not prepared for it, it means that we have been preparing too slowly," he said. "And I think finding out which types of deepfakes are actually a threat today, as opposed to a theoretical future threat, as the technology progresses, is one of the things we need to make sure we're right."
But Zuckerberg Left Behind The way Facebook processes political ads that have long avoided verification of facts. "I think we're in the right place here," he said. "In general, I think that in a democracy, people should be able to hear what politicians say."
The Bidens' Trump ad campaign made claims about their ties to Ukraine, a critical element in Congressional retrenchment Biden's campaign prompted Facebook to remove the ad and described it as false, but the social network refused and pointed to a policy against reviewing such political statements. The company's response drew widespread complaints from Biden and other Democratic candidates for 2020, including Warren, adding that Zuckerberg admitted that Facebook essentially benefited from misinformation.
Speaking later in Georgetown on Thursday, he acknowledged that the company had once considered the ban on political advertising, but decided against it, believing it "favored incumbents and media representatives." 19659002] But a spokesman for Biden's campaign, Bill Russo, later attacked Zuckerberg for unconvincing reasoning. "Zuckerberg tried to use the constitution as a shield for the company's bottom line, and his decision to place Facebook politics in a feigned concern for freedom of expression shows how unprepared his company is for this unique moment in our history and how little It has learned in recent years. "
Facebook has been criticized by both sides of the aisle, which content it censors. For example, Republicans have claimed that the company is censoring conservative users and news sites, an allegation that the company has long denied.
"Often, the people who call most often to remove content are the first to complain about content that is on the wrong side of a policy," Zuckerberg said. "These are very complex topics, and in general, unless it is absolutely clear what to do, I think you want to err on the side of a larger expression."
For many Democrats, however, Trump's ads reveal big flaws on Facebook These malicious actors could be exploited to spread false information for the 2020 presidential election, just as Russian agents used Facebook and other social media to spread lies, social and political Riots and undermine Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Zuckerberg emphasized this He believes that Facebook is "now much better able" to stop such disinformation campaigns, and refers to the company's investments in human resources and artificial intelligence. However, he also warned that misinformation is a threat that "could never tell you that they will disappear as they move forward". In recent months, Facebook has reported disinformation campaigns from countries such as Iran and China. 19659002] He blamed the lack of a first reaction from the US government as a reason for the worsening of the problem since the last presidential elections. "Unfortunately, after 2016, the US did not have a particularly strong reaction to Russia," he continued, "sending a signal to other countries that they could agree to that."
Zuckerberg's Speech Comes Seven Months Later In his first call, he urged governments to adopt "rules for the Internet," and technology giants, including Facebook, should set up systems so that no one in the management or company determines what online is appropriate or not A sort of "supreme court" so that users can appeal against the decisions of the company about the content of the content.
Zuckerberg's message on Thursday, however, served as a warning that overreaction might suffocate that type of speech. The regulators are seeking protection.
He said that these days, more and more people who have a voice are leading to division and not bringing people together. In times of social tension, we express ourselves, and in the end we always believe that it was the wrong thing. "